Primum non nocere
The whole issue of executive compensation is getting explosive again, fueled by the healthcare fight in the US.
The last round of executive compensation debate and media coverage focused on financial sector executives, essentially concentrating on the astronomical dollar amounts of their salaries. The story seemed to have lost its legs after the White House appointed a “Pay Czar” and the economy sprouted “green shoots.”
I’m not suggesting the highest paid hedge fund manager making $3.7 billion, and the next two managers taking home close to $3 billion each in 2007, does not look like excessive compensation. But, let’s face it – it’s not easy to imagine victims behind those mega numbers. That may change with Sick for Profit, a new campaign launched by Brave New Films’ Director Robert Greenwald last month.
What makes this new strategy more effective for the advocates of government-funded, single-payer healthcare insurance is the old, but valid PR adage: images unite, issues divide. Mr. Greenwald made a powerful, six-minute video juxtaposing images of the victims and salaries of CEOs in the health insurance industry. The video’s correlation between executive compensation based on profit and denial of claims for sick and dying patients is inescapable.
One patient was repeatedly denied payment for drugs she needed to stay alive, according to a quote from the video in the Huffington Post. “I tried to explain to them that if I do not have this, I will die. And the only response she gave me was, ‘OK.’”
Stephen J. Hemsley of UnitedHealth is one of the CEOs featured prominently in the video. He made $13.2 million in 2007, only 0.356% compared to the top-earning hedge fund manager in the same year. (Yes, that’s one third of a percent.) However, Mr. Hemsley did well with total value of unexercised stock options worth $744,232,068, according to the Sick for Profit website.
Gut-wrenching scenes of sick people, including babies, side by side with salaries paid to health insurance CEOs has made the mini-documentary a hit on YouTube, with more than 142,000 views. The Sick for Profit website got 15,419 visitors on August 10th alone.
The video and the campaign made me think of Peter Drucker’s chapter called Not Knowingly to Do Harm, in his book Management, Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. “The first responsibility of a professional was spelled out clearly, twenty-five hundred years ago, in the Hippocratic oath of the Greek physician: Primum non nocere – ‘Above all, not knowingly to do harm,’” wrote the great management guru of functioning capitalism. This applies to any professional, including managers.
Mr. Drucker brings up another issue related to not knowingly to do harm. He cautioned about American managers’ proclivity for violating the rule with respect to:
- Executive Compensation
- Use of benefit plans to impose “golden fetters” on people in the company’s employ
- Their profit rhetoric
The chapter ends with a warning that “…as the physicians found out long ago, it is not an easy rule to live up to. Its very modesty and self-constraint make it the right rule for the ethics that managers need, the ethics of responsibility.”
Communicating corporate culture
Improving corporate culture is one of those holy grails that management on every level talks about, hoping to influence how employees interact with each other and customers. I’m sure many of you lived through mergers and acquisitions and were told how these would produce far better results than either company could achieve on its own. (Yes, the word “synergy” is used a lot.) But based on statistics collected over decades, mergers have experienced dismal failure rates, even worse than marriages.
Corporate culture is often cited as a chief culprit in failed acquisitions. A book by Timothy J. Galpin and Mark Herndon, The Complete Guide to Mergers and Acquisitions: Process Tools to Support M&A Integration at Every Level, described a study of 190 CEOs, CFOs and other top executives with experience in global acquisitions (Watson Wyatt Worldwide 1998a). They found that “cultural incompatibility is consistently rated as the greatest barrier to successful integration but that research on cultural factors is the kind least likely to be conducted as an aspect of due diligence.”
Whether you are going through a merger or not, corporate culture is more than critical to your company’s health. “The thing I have learned at IBM is that culture is everything,” said Louis V. Gerstner Jr., former CEO of IBM. Managing corporate culture well and consistently should come before all else, including, for example, managing your brand. A dysfunctional corporate culture cannot create a trustworthy brand, even if you have a great branding agency. And there is another fallacy some companies pursue, often with a vengeance: the quixotic quest to change culture.
“Company cultures are like country cultures. Never try to change one. Try, instead, to work with what you’ve got,” said Peter Drucker. And working with what you got means communicating positive attributes of your culture, and highlighting characteristics that made particular individuals or groups in your organization successful. By creating personal narratives you make your stories real because they stick in people’s minds far longer than artificial, non-personal examples. These narratives can also show instances of corrective actions, when you feel that certain behaviours are inconsistent with the kind of corporate culture you want to maintain.
I have found there is something very personal about communicating corporate culture. You should give serious consideration to using social media to initiate a conversation with your employees and other stakeholders. By having a dialogue about your organizational values, morals and manners, you may find that communicating corporate culture is not about power projected from the executive office. It’s all about influence. (Please see my last post about the difference between power and influence.)
And if you’re still not convinced that communicating the right corporate culture matters, here’s one last piece of proof to consider. John Kotter and James Heskett of Harvard Business School made an interesting observation about the correlation between an organization’s culture and its performance: “We found that firms with cultures that emphasized all the key managerial constituencies (customers, stockholders, and employees) and leadership from managers at all levels outperformed firms that did not have those cultural traits by a huge margin.”
